Was New Hampshire Election Fixed For Hillary?

[RW]

So here's another election where all the polls were showing Obama
winning, some by double digits, and then Hillary wins by 3%. I took
statistics in college, and a poll that's done right isn't going to be
off by more than + or - 3%. Max Cleland was leading in all the polls,
then he lost his election for the Senate in Georgia. John Kerry was
leading in all the exit polls in Ohio, then he lost the election.
Again, this is statistically impossible. Folks, this election was
rigged. They rigged the elections in 2000 and 2004. They've got us
using voting machines now that tests show can very easily be hacked
and don't even leave a paper trail to allow an honest recount. By
excluding Ron Paul from the Fox News New Hampshire debate after he had
gotten a 10% vote in Iowa is one type of rigging an election. Dennis
Kucinich was excluded from the recent Democratic debates. The
connection is that these guys are anti-war. They want us to get out of
Iraq as do most of the American people. You say that Hillary is
against the Iraq war too, but Russian intelligence doesn't expect any
changes from the Bush administration from a Hillary Clinton
presidency. They say she would continue Bush's policy to divide Iraq
into three semi-autonomous regions with permanent US bases in the Kurd
region. And these guys are rigging elections all over, not just the
US. Canada, Mexico, France, Ukraine, Poland, etc. This is where a lot
of the money supposedly going to the phoney "War on Terror" is going.
It can now be revealed that Benazir Bhutto was prepared to tell
Senator Arlen Specter and Congressman Patrick Kennedy that she had
proof that Musharraf was planning to rig the upcoming Pakistani
elections with funds from the US supposedly to be used to fight
terrorism on the day she was assassinated. See
http://www.mcclatchydc.com/homepage/story/24001.html

[j***@yahoo.com]

Was New Hampshire Election Fixed For Hillary?

No - only republicans steal elections - the Clintons have always been
honest - about everything.

So she can win witout a fix.

[Mike Flannigan]

Was New Hampshire Election Fixed For Hillary?
No - only republicans steal elections - the Clintons have always been
honest - about everything.
So she can win witout a fix.

Hahahahaha!

[Christopher Helms]

Post by RW
So here's another election where all the polls were showing Obama
winning, some by double digits, and then Hillary wins by 3%. I took
statistics in college, and a poll that's done right isn't going to be
off by more than + or - 3%. Max Cleland was leading in all the polls,
then he lost his election for the Senate in Georgia. John Kerry was
leading in all the exit polls in Ohio, then he lost the election.
Again, this is statistically impossible. Folks, this election was
rigged. They rigged the elections in 2000 and 2004. They've got us
using voting machines now that tests show can very easily be hacked
and don't even leave a paper trail to allow an honest recount.

This is yet another one of those poll-defying, evidence defying,
Republican boosting (Repugs *want* to run against Hillary), mysterious
occurrences that keep on happening and just when the Republicans need
them to happen, too. The fringe, wacko right just can't lose when
electronic voting machines are in the picture. Polling data which you
could set your watch by for the last 75 years suddenly doesn't mean
jack shit, Hillary goes from losing by double digits in NH to winning
easily, in 2004 Howard Dean mysteriously goes from massive popularity
to no popularity at all overnight, John Kerry mysteriously goes from
winning to losing in Ohio and about a dozen other states, The French
are suddenly flying out of their chairs to vote for the most Bush
like, warmongering neocon candidate they can possibly find, piss poor
Mexicans suddenly agree that they aren't poor enough and they elect a
Chimp clone who feels the same way, Canada goes from loathing Bush to
electing a Dubya admirer and nobody suspects anything at all. It's
time to start suspecting something because it's right there, begging
to be noticed.


Diebold, the gift that keeps on giving. And taking and flipping and
selectively erasing.

[pukus]

Of course it is fixed..by the democrate party. Take a good look at the
michigan ballot. The only one on the ballot is hillary clinton. Why, because
they know hillary will be the only one to keep her name on the ballot,
therefore the only one a democrate will vote for is hillary even if there
are other options that are available. People want to vote for a winner even
if they know the person is rotten. Which is why there is so much trouble in
the democrate and republican parties.

Post by RW
So here's another election where all the polls were showing Obama
winning, some by double digits, and then Hillary wins by 3%. I took
statistics in college, and a poll that's done right isn't going to be
off by more than + or - 3%. Max Cleland was leading in all the polls,
then he lost his election for the Senate in Georgia. John Kerry was
leading in all the exit polls in Ohio, then he lost the election.
Again, this is statistically impossible. Folks, this election was
rigged. They rigged the elections in 2000 and 2004. They've got us
using voting machines now that tests show can very easily be hacked
and don't even leave a paper trail to allow an honest recount. By
excluding Ron Paul from the Fox News New Hampshire debate after he had
gotten a 10% vote in Iowa is one type of rigging an election. Dennis
Kucinich was excluded from the recent Democratic debates. The
connection is that these guys are anti-war. They want us to get out of
Iraq as do most of the American people. You say that Hillary is
against the Iraq war too, but Russian intelligence doesn't expect any
changes from the Bush administration from a Hillary Clinton
presidency. They say she would continue Bush's policy to divide Iraq
into three semi-autonomous regions with permanent US bases in the Kurd
region. And these guys are rigging elections all over, not just the
US. Canada, Mexico, France, Ukraine, Poland, etc. This is where a lot
of the money supposedly going to the phoney "War on Terror" is going.
It can now be revealed that Benazir Bhutto was prepared to tell
Senator Arlen Specter and Congressman Patrick Kennedy that she had
proof that Musharraf was planning to rig the upcoming Pakistani
elections with funds from the US supposedly to be used to fight
terrorism on the day she was assassinated. See
http://www.mcclatchydc.com/homepage/story/24001.html