Discussion:
Boondoggle #1
(too old to reply)
Archangel
2009-03-09 18:17:24 UTC
Permalink
Boondoggle #1

$97 Million for a Program That’s Being Cancelled — When the government
decided to replace old nuclear warheads with new ones, scientists at Los
Alamos National Laboratory said they needed two new buildings to produce
the necessary plutonium components. One of those structures is
reportedly nearing completion.
President Obama recently announced, however, that he is canceling the
Reliable Replacement Warhead program based on scientists’ recommendation
that it’s unnecessary. That should save the public a lot of money, right?
Think again: Officials are moving forward with the second new building
anyway. The spending bill includes $97 million for the Chemistry and
Metallurgy Research Replacement (CMRR) facilities at Los Alamos. That’s
up from $74 million in 2008, which was a big increase from the $54
million spent in 2007. In other words, the budget for a program that is
now being eliminated has increased 80 percent in the past two years.
“The question is why are they building this building?” asks Laura
Peterson of Taxpayers for Common Sense. “There’s been a lot of concern
about taking on a giant new construction project at Los Alamos, when the
primary justification for the project is gone. From our point of view,
that’s some pretty questionable funding.”

http://www.newsmax.com/newsfront/spending_boondoggles/2009/03/08/189683.html

CHANGE YOU CAN COUNT ON!!

ARCHANGEL
Reverend Billy Bob
2009-03-09 19:25:15 UTC
Permalink
Post by Archangel
Boondoggle #1
$97 Million for a Program That’s Being Cancelled — When the government
decided to replace old nuclear warheads with new ones, scientists at Los
Alamos National Laboratory said they needed two new buildings to produce
the necessary plutonium components. One of those structures is reportedly
nearing completion.
President Obama recently announced, however, that he is canceling the
Reliable Replacement Warhead program based on scientists’ recommendation
that it’s unnecessary. That should save the public a lot of money, right?
Think again: Officials are moving forward with the second new building
anyway. The spending bill includes $97 million for the Chemistry and
Metallurgy Research Replacement (CMRR) facilities at Los Alamos. That’s up
from $74 million in 2008, which was a big increase from the $54 million
spent in 2007. In other words, the budget for a program that is now being
eliminated has increased 80 percent in the past two years.
“The question is why are they building this building?” asks Laura Peterson
of Taxpayers for Common Sense. “There’s been a lot of concern about taking
on a giant new construction project at Los Alamos, when the primary
justification for the project is gone. From our point of view, that’s some
pretty questionable funding.”
http://www.newsmax.com/newsfront/spending_boondoggles/2009/03/08/189683.html
CHANGE YOU CAN COUNT ON!!
ARCHANGEL
Why didn't Bush do something about it. He had 8 years, Obama's had 6 weeks.
Vandar
2009-03-09 21:16:09 UTC
Permalink
Post by Reverend Billy Bob
Post by Archangel
Boondoggle #1
$97 Million for a Program That’s Being Cancelled — When the government
decided to replace old nuclear warheads with new ones, scientists at Los
Alamos National Laboratory said they needed two new buildings to produce
the necessary plutonium components. One of those structures is reportedly
nearing completion.
President Obama recently announced, however, that he is canceling the
Reliable Replacement Warhead program based on scientists’ recommendation
that it’s unnecessary. That should save the public a lot of money, right?
Think again: Officials are moving forward with the second new building
anyway. The spending bill includes $97 million for the Chemistry and
Metallurgy Research Replacement (CMRR) facilities at Los Alamos. That’s up
from $74 million in 2008, which was a big increase from the $54 million
spent in 2007. In other words, the budget for a program that is now being
eliminated has increased 80 percent in the past two years.
“The question is why are they building this building?” asks Laura Peterson
of Taxpayers for Common Sense. “There’s been a lot of concern about taking
on a giant new construction project at Los Alamos, when the primary
justification for the project is gone. From our point of view, that’s some
pretty questionable funding.”
http://www.newsmax.com/newsfront/spending_boondoggles/2009/03/08/189683.html
CHANGE YOU CAN COUNT ON!!
ARCHANGEL
Why didn't Bush do something about it. He had 8 years, Obama's had 6 weeks.
Bush was a bad president. What's Obama's excuse?
Archangel
2009-03-09 21:51:46 UTC
Permalink
Post by Vandar
Post by Reverend Billy Bob
Post by Archangel
Boondoggle #1
$97 Million for a Program That’s Being Cancelled — When the
government decided to replace old nuclear warheads with new ones,
scientists at Los Alamos National Laboratory said they needed two new
buildings to produce the necessary plutonium components. One of those
structures is reportedly nearing completion.
President Obama recently announced, however, that he is canceling the
Reliable Replacement Warhead program based on scientists’
recommendation that it’s unnecessary. That should save the public a
lot of money, right?
Think again: Officials are moving forward with the second new
building anyway. The spending bill includes $97 million for the
Chemistry and Metallurgy Research Replacement (CMRR) facilities at
Los Alamos. That’s up from $74 million in 2008, which was a big
increase from the $54 million spent in 2007. In other words, the
budget for a program that is now being eliminated has increased 80
percent in the past two years.
“The question is why are they building this building?” asks Laura
Peterson of Taxpayers for Common Sense. “There’s been a lot of
concern about taking on a giant new construction project at Los
Alamos, when the primary justification for the project is gone. From
our point of view, that’s some pretty questionable funding.”
http://www.newsmax.com/newsfront/spending_boondoggles/2009/03/08/189683.html
CHANGE YOU CAN COUNT ON!!
ARCHANGEL
Why didn't Bush do something about it. He had 8 years, Obama's had 6 weeks.
Bush was a bad president. What's Obama's excuse?
There is this obscure little power of the president call a "veto" or is
Obama lacking the balls to "change" things

CHANGE YOU CAN COUNT ON!!

ARCHANGEL

Continue reading on narkive:
Loading...