Discussion:
Big Bang-or Big Hoax?
(too old to reply)
Archangel
2007-08-20 17:08:41 UTC
Permalink
Big Bang—or Big Hoax?

At its very core, the Big Bang Theory states that a particular event caused
the formation of matter, with our modern universe expanding from that
initial event. After the big bang, another theory takes over. The
“inflationary model” was created to explain how a single event caused the
expansive universe that exists today.

However, both concepts break laws of science. As we saw with the Second Law
of Thermodynamics, energy is continually moving into a more chaotic
state—with less usable energy—not into a larger, more complex universe. How
ridiculous that this FACT is ignored!

But an even bigger problem is the First Law of Thermodynamics, often called
the Law of Conservation of Energy. It is memorized by high school students,
and is a basic fundamental law of science. It states that energy cannot be
created or destroyed, but can only change its form.

This too flies in the face of the big bang theory! If energy cannot be
created, then something certainly cannot appear from nothing. Evolutionary
scientists also understand this problem. Often, attention is taken away
from the lack of explanation of the creation of matter by asserting
explanations on how the universe “grew.” By lumping the initial creation of
matter with the expansion of the universe, scientists have created a series
of “smoke and mirrors,” which, as we have seen before, is often the only
way to explain various aspects of evolution.

Many scientists, such as Alan Guth, have also raised this point: “First of
all, I will say that at the purely technical level, inflation itself does
not explain how the universe arose from nothing...Inflation itself takes a
very small universe and produces from it a very big universe. But inflation
by itself does not explain where that very small universe came from” (Fred,
Heerren, Show Me God). Such deceit is taught as fact in schools!

One of the greatest mathematical minds of the modern world closed the door
on the inflationary model: “The new inflationary model was a good attempt
to explain why the universe is the way it is...In my personal opinion, the
new inflationary model is now dead as a scientific theory, although a lot
of people do not seem to have not heard of its demise and are still writing
papers on it as if it were viable” (Stephen W. Hawking, A Brief History of
Time).

Like so many aspects of evolution, even when it has been proven to be
inaccurate, it is still taught as fact. The smoke and mirrors continue!

Archangel
Patriot Games
2007-08-20 20:48:48 UTC
Permalink
Post by Archangel
Big Bang—or Big Hoax?
At its very core, the Big Bang Theory states that a particular event caused
the formation of matter, with our modern universe expanding from that
initial event. After the big bang, another theory takes over. The
“inflationary model” was created to explain how a single event caused the
expansive universe that exists today.
So far, so good.
Post by Archangel
However, both concepts break laws of science.
You ASSUME that certain laws of science EXISTED at that/those times. They
didn't.
Post by Archangel
(Stephen W. Hawking, A Brief History of Time).
He's about half a crackpot.

Continue reading on narkive:
Loading...